{"id":361,"date":"2003-07-24T12:19:40","date_gmt":"2003-07-24T12:19:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/2003\/07\/gerald_kaufman\/"},"modified":"2003-07-24T12:19:40","modified_gmt":"2003-07-24T12:19:40","slug":"gerald_kaufman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/2003\/07\/gerald_kaufman\/","title":{"rendered":"Gerald Kaufman"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I know that they do it on purpose, but today&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.broadcastnow.co.uk\/frames\/master.asp\">Broadcast<\/a> (no direct link to the story since they&#8217;re subscription only) has a piece by Mr Kaufman once again banging on about how the BBC have handled the David Kelly mess badly.<br \/>\nHis main issue is that the BBC talked about an &#8220;intelligence source&#8221;, and since Dr Kelly didn&#8217;t work for MI5 or anything, then he couldn&#8217;t be called that. I&#8217;d say that anyone who worked for the MoD was an intelligence source, but what do I know. His main issue is that he doesn&#8217;t like the way the BBC is governed &#8211; he wanted it under Ofcom.<br \/>\nWhat he doesn&#8217;t appreciate, or at least want to accept, is that the BBC loses a lot of it independence from Government. It&#8217;s unique, and at the moment, it has no beholdence to the Governement of the day.<br \/>\nAnd finally in his last few words he threatens, as is his want:<br \/>\n&#8220;Maybe it should be funded by subscription. Maybe, even, it should be privatised.&#8221;<br \/>\nBrilliant ideas. That should improve the quality of our TV no end. When he was conducting his select committee questioning about films in the UK, the BBC was seen as a possible producer. I don&#8217;t see a struggling privatised company going into an area that even Channel 4 daren&#8217;t now tread.<br \/>\nAnd he has the nerve to accuse the BBC of &#8220;ineffable smugness&#8221; when it might have been designed to describe himself.  I&#8217;m <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bowblog.com\/archives\/000426.html\">not exactly alone<\/a> in thinking this either. The BBC have only themselves to blame because these questions are on the agenda he says.<br \/>\nNo, Mr Kaufman.  These questions are on the agenda because you put them there.<br \/>\nThe BBC is under attack because your government took exception to a piece of independent reporting that has been shown to be in the large part factually correct, and to which no-one is disputing it.<br \/>\nThe BBC is under attack because your government took a reluctant country to war without proving the case.<br \/>\nThe BBC is under attack because once that war had been fought, the promised proof to show that the reasons given were well founded, was not brought to life.<br \/>\nThe BBC is under attack because your government threw a loyal civil servant to the hungry hounds to throw the pack off the true scent.<br \/>\nSaddam was a nasty piece of works which the world is better off without (although I was still perturbed that the death of Saddam&#8217;s sons, evil though they no doubt were, was described as <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/uk_politics\/3088569.stm\">&#8220;great news&#8221;<\/a> by our Christian PM), but there are many more evil dictators about in the world (one of the ex-ones is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/g2\/story\/0,3604,1004664,00.html\">dying<\/a> at the moment). And to a country like Zimbabwe we owe more than most.<br \/>\nBut the case for war has not been proved. We&#8217;ve been told it would be, and it hasn&#8217;t.<br \/>\nUntil your government has answered that question Mr Kaufman, do not try to strangle the editorial independence of the BBC.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I know that they do it on purpose, but today&#8217;s Broadcast (no direct link to the story since they&#8217;re subscription only) has a piece by Mr Kaufman once again banging on about how the BBC have handled the David Kelly mess badly. His main issue is that the BBC talked about an &#8220;intelligence source&#8221;, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=361"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=361"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=361"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=361"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}