{"id":3157,"date":"2013-05-21T11:31:44","date_gmt":"2013-05-21T11:31:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/2013\/05\/some_first_thou\/"},"modified":"2013-05-21T11:31:44","modified_gmt":"2013-05-21T11:31:44","slug":"some_first_thou","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/2013\/05\/some_first_thou\/","title":{"rendered":"Some First Thoughts on the New Flickr"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A new look Flickr has been unveiled today (or last night). It seems to be part of Marissa Meyer&#8217;s attempt to make Yahoo more relevant. And of course Yahoo has also just paid an awful lot of money for Tumblr. Yahoo is a company without the letter &#8220;e&#8221;.<br \/>\nWhat follows is based on some very limited time spent using the new look site, and what immediately comes to mind for someone like me. I should first say that I&#8217;ve been a Flickr user since 2005, and currently have upwards of 10,000 photos on the site. That doesn&#8217;t represent &#8220;all&#8221; my photos however. I tend to treat Flickr as a site to show off the photos I want made public or shareable. My own NAS archive has upwards of 100,000 photos to put that in perspective. And there are still many photos and negatives that don&#8217;t exist in digital form.<br \/>\nIn general I find the new look better. Gone are the white spaces, and every centimetre of monitor space is handed over to photos. Perhaps it&#8217;s a tad over-zealous, but it&#8217;s better than what we had before, which seemed unchanged since I became a Flickr member.<br \/>\nPhotos by default are now on a black background &#8211; a lightbox view. This works well with my photos, and I have no objections. However, I do think that users should be able to choose between white and black. If I were an illustrator, or use predominantly light\/pale colours in my photos, white might suit them better.<br \/>\nI don&#8217;t actually mind too much that descriptions, tags, EXIF and comments are below the fold. Perhaps this will have a knock on effect with the community aspect of Flickr, but I still like the maximised use of space.<br \/>\nIn places the new look feels a bit rushed. There are signs of the old website still here and there. If they really did rush this redesign then they&#8217;ve done well to make it as smooth as it is. There are some rough edges to be sanded off though. And a bit more flexibility from a user perspective wouldn&#8217;t go amiss.<br \/>\nThe big thing is that they&#8217;ve giving everyone 1TB of space for their photos. There&#8217;s no two ways about it. This is a lot. They&#8217;ve done what Gmail did when they launched against Hotmail, and blow their rivals out of the water with regard to space. Google had only recently made a big issue  about their unified 15GB of space. This is a clear retort to that.<br \/>\nBut if everyone gets 1TB, then why would I pay for &#8220;unlimited&#8221; space? Well the &#8220;Pro&#8221; account is going. I&#8217;ve paid $25 a year for nearly my entire time on Flickr. And my 10,000 photos in JPG format wouldn&#8217;t take anything like that amount of space. So in many regards, the space doesn&#8217;t really matter because nobody (well, hardly anybody) is going to use it. But free does introduce ads. So Flickr is now offering a $50 option to go ad-free. I believe that I&#8217;ll be &#8220;grandfathered&#8221; on my $25 account &#8211; which includes stats as well. But would I pay $50 to remove ads? I&#8217;m not sure. And I&#8217;m not sure that Flickr would earn anything like that much from me. It feels a bit high, and I&#8217;m not sure I understand that part of the model.<br \/>\nI certainly don&#8217;t understand their &#8220;Doublr&#8221; option which gives me 2TB for $500! OK, anybody who needed that amount would clearly have more than 1TB and therefore be in the top 0.05% of users in terms of space used. But $500 is absurd. If you&#8217;re using that amount of space then you really shouldn&#8217;t be using Flickr for your photographic needs. In any case, there are much better options for that kind of storage in the cloud at much better prices. I can only assume it&#8217;s some kind of psychological device to make consumers believe that they&#8217;re getting $500 value for free with their first terabyte.<br \/>\nYou would imagine that even now, Flickr engineers are making it very easy to send photos to Tumblr blogs (there is a Tumblr button already). The marketing message of the &#8220;1TB of data&#8221; seems to be that we upload every photo we have to Flickr rather than just our selects. Then sharing specific pictures to social media or a Tumblr blog is where we curate? In any case, say you have an interest in steam engines. In amongst your regular photos you probably have a few steam engine specific photos. Sharing those to Tumblr where your steam engine enthusiast friends can see them makes sense.<br \/>\nI must admit I&#8217;ve never quite &#8220;got&#8221; Tumblr. The long lists of people who &#8220;like&#8221; or &#8220;reblogged&#8221; things never entirely makes sense. And does &#8220;reblogged&#8221; mean &#8220;steal&#8221;? I&#8217;ll stick with this blog thanks!<br \/>\nAllied to all this, there&#8217;s a very decent upgrade to the Flickr Android app, and overall I&#8217;d say that they&#8217;re on the right path. I think the service still needs some tweaks and clean-up. But it&#8217;s heading in the right direction.<br \/>\nWhether coming weeks and months make me regret anything I&#8217;ve said here remains to be seen&#8230;<br \/>\n[Update] One more obvious problem is the constantly unclickable footer of the homepage! As you scroll down to click on it, more photos load. It needs to be moved!<br \/>\nAnd I&#8217;m a little confused about the whole &#8220;stats&#8221; thing. It&#8217;s being sold as something &#8220;Pros&#8221; get. But it&#8217;s not mentioned in any of the now available plans. So if I join up today and pay nothing, $50 or $500, it&#8217;s not clear that I get any stats. To be honest, I&#8217;m not sure that this should be considered that special! I&#8217;d expect any site to give me that kind of granularity. You get it on YouTube for example.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A new look Flickr has been unveiled today (or last night). It seems to be part of Marissa Meyer&#8217;s attempt to make Yahoo more relevant. And of course Yahoo has also just paid an awful lot of money for Tumblr. Yahoo is a company without the letter &#8220;e&#8221;. What follows is based on some very [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3157"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3157"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3157\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3157"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}