{"id":2590,"date":"2009-08-03T13:27:02","date_gmt":"2009-08-03T13:27:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/2009\/08\/the_observer\/"},"modified":"2009-08-03T13:27:02","modified_gmt":"2009-08-03T13:27:02","slug":"the_observer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/2009\/08\/the_observer\/","title":{"rendered":"The Observer"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/media\/2009\/aug\/03\/observer-newspaper-guardian-media-group\">News emerged<\/a> at the weekend that Guardian Media Group is said to be discussing the future of The Observer &#8211; one of the oldest newspapers in the world.<br \/>\nOne idea seems to be to turn it into a weekly news magazine &#8211; I assume in the style of Time, Newsweek or The Economist.<br \/>\nThat&#8217;d be a great shame. But The Observer really does need to do something. As a regular reader (and purchaser) of the paper, it has noticeably got worse over recent weeks. The TV section disappeared and has been folded into the back of the Review section. I&#8217;m guessing this uses up Review pagination too. The Business and Media section now has little to no media coverage. Cash was folded into that section some time ago.<br \/>\nI&#8217;ve never been a big fan of newspaper magazines &#8211;  why do they all carry expensively photographed fashion sections? The Observer Magazine has been relaunched more times than I can count, but it doesn&#8217;t carry any columnist I find remotely interesting. Worse than that, it still carries horoscopes &#8211; something that should never be carried in a serious newspaper. I chuck out the magazine unread far too frequently.<br \/>\n(It must be said that the same could be said of The Guardian&#8217;s Saturday magazine, but there is occassionally a good issue, like this weekend&#8217;s short story edition).<br \/>\nThe Sport monthly is very good, and although it doesn&#8217;t interest me, so is the Food supplement.<br \/>\nBut Women doesn&#8217;t interest me and is genuinely awful in conceit.<br \/>\nThe real problem lies in the main paper. Too many columns full of fluff. I don&#8217;t care about Jude Law, and don&#8217;t need to read a columnists writing about not-caring about Jude Law. If I wanted to read Heat or OK, I&#8217;d buy those magazines. They&#8217;d do a better job.<br \/>\nSerious commentators like Will Hutton, Nic Cohen and the excellent Henry Porter are good. David Mitchell is a nice addition. But ditch the rest. Give me long investigative and interesting pieces of <I>news<\/I> coverage.<br \/>\nAnd if you can&#8217;t do that, give me more foreign coverage. I&#8217;m really not sure why it&#8217;s relegated to the back of the main section.<br \/>\nOh and please change your TV reviewer&#8230; Just about anybody would be better. At least there&#8217;s still Philip French.<br \/>\nIt&#8217;s always interesting to read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/media\/2009\/aug\/03\/theobserver-guardianmediagroup?showallcomments=true\">comments<\/a> on Media Guardian in places like Roy Greenslade&#8217;s blog. There&#8217;s obviously still a lot of hostility from people upset when Roger Alton was replaced &#8211; but his editorial reign saw many of the issues that are still there.<br \/>\nMy problem is that if The Observer stopped Sunday publication, I really don&#8217;t know what other paper I could read. The Independent on Sunday is a poor relation with little value to it given the cover price. The Sunday Times just annoys me. The Mail on Sunday disgusts me. The Sunday Telegraph feels like something I shouldn&#8217;t be able to read for at least twenty years.<br \/>\nI fear that I would actually stop reading a Sunday newspaper.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>News emerged at the weekend that Guardian Media Group is said to be discussing the future of The Observer &#8211; one of the oldest newspapers in the world. One idea seems to be to turn it into a weekly news magazine &#8211; I assume in the style of Time, Newsweek or The Economist. That&#8217;d be [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2590"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2590"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2590\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}