{"id":2459,"date":"2009-01-15T21:56:08","date_gmt":"2009-01-15T21:56:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/2009\/01\/too_demanding_f\/"},"modified":"2009-01-15T21:56:08","modified_gmt":"2009-01-15T21:56:08","slug":"too_demanding_f","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/2009\/01\/too_demanding_f\/","title":{"rendered":"Too Demanding For Watch"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.broadcastnow.co.uk\/news\/multichannel\/2009\/01\/uktv_drops_relationship_dramas_in_watch_rethink.html\">a wonderful story<\/a> in this week&#8217;s Broadcast magazine. In a piece that explains how UKTV chanel &#8220;Watch&#8221; is having a bit of a rethink, it explains that challenging fare like Cranford, Mistresses and Love Soup is too &#8220;demanding&#8221; for its viewers. Instead they&#8217;re going to show more Dancing with the Stars and Wipeout (aka <a href=\"http:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/weblog\/archive\/002625.html\">Total Wipeout<\/a>).<br \/>\nTo paraphrase something someone else once said, nobody ever got poor underestimating your viewers.<br \/>\nThey&#8217;re saying that their viewers are too thick to understand continuing storylines are they?<br \/>\nYes &#8211; I&#8217;m being a little disingenuous. What they really mean is that programmes with continuing storylines don&#8217;t play as well on a channel that is largely sampled on an occassional basis. But that just means you have to try a little harder.<br \/>\nI think that UKTV just expected Watch to succeed on the basis that Dave had been a success. But then Dave&#8217;s proposition is clearer, and crucially, it&#8217;s on Freeview. Allied to top quality BBC2 programming (largely), you know what you&#8217;re going to get. And fairly shortly we&#8217;ll be getting Dave+1 on Freeview too. One wag asked why it was necessary when Dave repeats its shows in the course of the evening anyway.<br \/>\nBut back to Watch. It&#8217;s not on Freeview, and perhaps they&#8217;d have been smarter using that Freeview slot to launch it on that platform. Evidently the amount of Sky\/Virgin Media subscription cash they&#8217;re getting means that the economics don&#8217;t work.<br \/>\nThen there&#8217;s Richard and Judy. They defected from Channel 4 to the station in what can only have been a big money signing. But they went out at 8pm &#8211; opposite soaps, sitcoms and popular drama on BBC1 and ITV1. You can only think that R&#038;J&#8217;s audience was more likely to be on those channels rather than Watch. 8pm is a curious time for a nightly chat show.<br \/>\nThe press loves to report how few people are watching the channel on occassion, but that&#8217;s unfair for a channel that repeats those shows several times over a 24 hour period.<br \/>\nNonetheless, 6pm is probably a smarter time for the show to go out. It&#8217;s against news on the main channels, or the likes of Hollyoaks or Eggheads on C4 or BBC2.<br \/>\nIn the long run, I can&#8217;t see that R&#038;J will ever return to their heyday. They&#8217;re probably banking decent cheques, but they&#8217;re out of sight and out of mind now. And I still find it amusing recalling an interview that Richard Madeley gave to the Media Guardian podcast when the show launched explaining that jumping to Watch was a smart move because in a few years we&#8217;d all be watching digital, irrespective of the fact that Watch is pay channel and Freeview and Freesat are clearly going to be the overall winners.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s a wonderful story in this week&#8217;s Broadcast magazine. In a piece that explains how UKTV chanel &#8220;Watch&#8221; is having a bit of a rethink, it explains that challenging fare like Cranford, Mistresses and Love Soup is too &#8220;demanding&#8221; for its viewers. Instead they&#8217;re going to show more Dancing with the Stars and Wipeout (aka [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,7],"tags":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2459"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2459"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2459\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2459"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2459"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2459"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}