{"id":1890,"date":"2007-04-03T18:22:31","date_gmt":"2007-04-03T18:22:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/2007\/04\/ugc\/"},"modified":"2007-04-03T18:22:31","modified_gmt":"2007-04-03T18:22:31","slug":"ugc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/2007\/04\/ugc\/","title":{"rendered":"UGC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sadly, not the late, and quite probably unlamented cinema chain (not that Cineworld is a whole lot better with useless security guards supposedly checking that I did video-phone films, and too few people manning the ticket desk at the weekend), but that ultimate flavour-of-the-nanosecond buzzword &#8220;user generated content.&#8221;<br \/>\nToday we learnt that LBC is rebranding itself &#8211; no longer will the initials stand for London Broadcasting Company. Now they&#8217;ll mean <a href=\"http:\/\/radiotoday.co.uk\/news.php?extend.1827\">London&#8217;s Biggest Conversation<\/a>. This shouldn&#8217;t be confused with &#8220;New&#8221; Labour&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/uk_politics\/3245620.stm\">Big Conversation<\/a> (now seemingly <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bigconversation.org.uk\/\">broken<\/a>).<br \/>\nAt the same time, the similarly named LBC 1152 will become the far more sensibly monickered <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chrysalis.com\/news_db\/BSkyB%20and%20Chrysalis%20Release%2027%2003%2007.pdf\">Sky News Radio for London<\/a>.<br \/>\nBut what made me laugh was the suggestion that LBC broadcasts &#8220;3000 hours of user-generated content a year.&#8221; As Media Guardian has also pointed out &#8211; they really mean &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.guardian.co.uk\/organgrinder\/2007\/04\/lbc_londons_biggest_conversati_1.html\">phone-ins<\/a>.&#8221; And in any case, this &#8220;content&#8221; isn&#8217;t entirely user-generated; most phone-ins rely on relatively skilled radio hosts and guests to come up with subject matters that listeners are interested in talking about. Then they have to challenge the listeners&#8217; views to make interesting radio. The listener is indeed an essential part of the mix for such radio, but then most stations rely on phone-calls, email and texts these days.<br \/>\nThe other day Zoe Williams in The Guardian <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/tv_and_radio\/story\/0,,2046222,00.html\">noted<\/a> the following regarding Channel 4 Radio&#8217;s licence bid:<br \/>\n<em>The bit that tickles me is the Channel 4 content. It is pitched to rival Radio 4, which heady task its director of radio, Nathalie Schwarz, says it plans to achieve with drama, documentary and &#8220;challenging speech-based content&#8221;. Is it possible to have any love of speech and yet use a phrase like &#8220;challenging speech-based content&#8221;? I will have a sip of my stimulating, caffeine-based beverage and come back to you on that.<\/em><br \/>\nCan we please have a moratorium on using the word &#8220;content&#8221;? To my mind it completely devalues your programming, music, reporting, analysis, conversation, contributions, or whatever it really is that you&#8217;re offering and soliciting. It&#8217;s a meaningless buzzword that proves nothing except that you read the marketing press fervently to prove you&#8217;re down with the kids and are following all the new trends.<br \/>\nI shall say nothing more except to mention that of course these views are my own and obviously don&#8217;t represent those of my employer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sadly, not the late, and quite probably unlamented cinema chain (not that Cineworld is a whole lot better with useless security guards supposedly checking that I did video-phone films, and too few people manning the ticket desk at the weekend), but that ultimate flavour-of-the-nanosecond buzzword &#8220;user generated content.&#8221; Today we learnt that LBC is rebranding [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1890"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1890"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1890\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}