{"id":1441,"date":"2006-04-05T18:02:03","date_gmt":"2006-04-05T18:02:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/2006\/04\/mazher_mahmood\/"},"modified":"2006-04-05T18:02:03","modified_gmt":"2006-04-05T18:02:03","slug":"mazher_mahmood","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/2006\/04\/mazher_mahmood\/","title":{"rendered":"Mazher Mahmood"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>OK. This is getting silly.<br \/>\nAccording to the latest news at <a href=\"http:\/\/media.guardian.co.uk\/\">Mediaguardian<\/a>, Mahmood&#8217;s won another temporary injunction preventing publication of his photograph.<br \/>\nWhy?<br \/>\nIf he was in a witness protection scheme, then I could understand it. But as far as I&#8217;m aware he&#8217;s not.<br \/>\nSo why can&#8217;t we see his picture.<br \/>\nWell, there&#8217;s an old photo at <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mazher_Mahmood\">Wikipedia<\/a>.<br \/>\nBut just because he doesn&#8217;t want his photo published everywhere, that&#8217;s really not a reason for it not to appear.<br \/>\nI don&#8217;t want my photo to appear in the News of the World. To be honest, they&#8217;re unlikely to want to publish my photo.<br \/>\nBut if I have an affair with, say, a famous actress, they might want to publish my photo (Again, this is incredibly unlikely).<br \/>\nIf they doorstep me, then I&#8217;m going to be doing well not to have my photo taken. And as long as they and I are both on public property, then there&#8217;s really very little I can do to stop them.<br \/>\nMaybe I <I>can<\/I> get an injunction to prevent them. I bet that there are quite a few tabloid <I>victims<\/I> who&#8217;d like to have similar injunctions.<br \/>\nThe News of the World&#8217;s making great play of the fact that his investigations have led to the conviction of 130 criminals. I&#8217;d like to see a list, but, nonetheless, he&#8217;s not an undercover policeman.<br \/>\nI trust, and expect, that this injunction will get turned over.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OK. This is getting silly. According to the latest news at Mediaguardian, Mahmood&#8217;s won another temporary injunction preventing publication of his photograph. Why? If he was in a witness protection scheme, then I could understand it. But as far as I&#8217;m aware he&#8217;s not. So why can&#8217;t we see his picture. Well, there&#8217;s an old [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1441"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1441"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1441\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.adambowie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}